Sunday, September 04, 2005

Day Five of Fury

I read another comment today - this time from someone in the UK whom I summarily blasted - about the deplorable way in which New Orleans and Louisiana responded to the needs of their impoverished citizens prior to the storm, not taking the necessary measures to evacuate more people, save more lives. I am again appalled at the simplicity of thinking that generates these sorts of comments. The dilemma of poverty in America is not so simple, the blame neither so easily placed nor so readily deserved.

There were many reasons for people remaining behind to await the storm - very few had to do with the ability to leave, except where transportation was truly lacking, but rather with the lack of choice of where to go. The impoverished were offered transportation - to the shelter of the Superdome, which only afterward became a poor choice. In previous storms, the Dome has been a semi-comfortable shelter for many people. Not home, but not desolate. It was the best we had to offer, considering the unpredictable nature of the storm. What if the city had sent people in the direction the storm chose to take? What then? What would have been the analysis then?

And this storm was mightier, much mightier, than any storm for many years. For the first time in 25 years, I evacuated. I felt this one was different. I was scared, and I have never feared a storm in my life, having grown up with tornadoes and having lived these past years with hurricanes. I am one of those who sit on the porch to watch the fury of nature. But this one ... my god, it was big. So big. To see the map and this damned storm covering the gulf from shore to shore, filling it to overflowing, no sign of the ocean waters beneath ... and to see that eye, tight, powerful, holding on to so much force. And to see just how far from the eye were the winds. No one should have been able to look at that and stayed behind. No one. But anyone looking at that must have wondered, as did I, just how far must I go to get away?

We drove, my daughter and I, for twelve hours. Due north. Roads to the west were jammed and roads to the east were still in the possible path for far too many miles for me to trust them. We drove north, into Arkansas; the first hotel available was 9 hours away. I have friends living a few hours beyond that, so we drove further.

I am sure the world will always believe that the poor were left to perish. But the world sees what the media shows and only that. After all, how newsworthy are the white folks who stayed behind because they didn't want to leave? Of course, that would put an entirely different spin on the story.

Not that poverty isn't an issue, but not for the reasons the media implies or the world infers. The reasons are much more complicated. I strongly believe that if the city had offered free lodging in hotels in Houston and Dallas and Memphis and had presented a streamlined charter bus with full-screen TVs for in-route movies, and all the food they could eat, very few of the impoverished would have remained in the city. The fact is, riding out the storm was a helluva lot more exciting than sitting it out in the Superdome.

I also strongly believe a certain contingent of those who remained behind in the center of the city did so in order to take advantage of the situation. If you are a thief and I tell you everyone in town is going to be gone for twelve hours ... everyone ... would you not stay? Yes, I am quite sure there were many of those who are looting now - for merchandise, not for food - who saw this as an opportunity.

As for the wealthy white population ... I suppose it is because they are so rich that so many are still awaiting evacuation, still in shelters, still wondering where they are going to live.Yes, the wealthy have more options. It has always been this way, and it will remain this way. With means comes opportunity. It is this that inspires people to achieve wealth. It is this that is the basis for our democratic, economically republic society. We have, as a country, denounced economic systems that prohibit or even limit the commerce that makes wealth possible. We actively seek to force our economic system and standards onto other nations. We can't have it both ways. If we have economic competition, we will continue to have those who achieve and those who do not. How can we, then, pass judgment when the system works in exactly this way?

Yes, the wealthy had a place to go and the means to get there on their own. The poor had the option of public transportation to public shelters. Many of the poor did stay because they could not afford to go anywhere but to these shelters, and shelters are not attractive in the best of times. I am curious as to what supports other countries - which are so quick to criticize - have in place to accommodate one million plus evacuees. I am sure we could learn from your example. What do you have set up to offer them as immediate, emergency housing? What do you have to offer for transportation to the sites, other than buses?

Remember, although we know these storms are coming, we cannot predict exactly where - and the when is predictable within only a few days, most of the time. I suppose a mobile evacuation site would be the answer. I suppose other countries have this - to accommodate one million plus people? And of course they have reserves of food and water stored there, with bedding and blankets? And doctors, hundreds of doctors and nurses, waiting for days, just in case ... And of course they have enough vehicles to provide the transportation?

As for the looting ... remember, most of those looting had nothing before the storm damage. Now many of them have wide-screen TVs. The local news media has made little reference to those who are looting for food, water, essentials, other than to say it is happening and to comment on the desperation. It is the looting for electronics, jewelry, guns, etc, that most of us living this madness have a problem with. And to tell you the truth, I have little problem with that. Where the heck are they going to plug in that big ol’ TV? How are they going to protect it from the rising water? How are they going to escape the typhus and other dreadful diseases they will contract from walking in that polluted water? My theory is, let them loot and drown with their plunder. But then, I have never believed we can "fix" everything. Some things are way too far beyond our control. Let nature take its course. It usually wins.

Was poverty an issue in the number left behind, the number left to be rescued, the number left to die? Of course, it is an issue. It is always an issue. Poverty has been an issue for years in this country. However, where was the indignation of the national leaders, the national black leaders, before the storm? How many millions of dollars have other nations sent to the US to save our starving children? How man of those in this country raising money for those in others have acknowledged that we have a huge problem with poverty and hunger and the diseases they beget right here on our one doorstep? Why did you wait until now to get angry about this? And when are you going to DO something?
.

7 Comments:

Blogger Ossian said...

Interesting analysis. There's a lot of truth in what you say.

But New Orleans is an exceptional city, and do you not think there should have been a pre-prepared plan to evacuate everyone with all the locations and resources prepared? It's not every city that is in danger of going 20 foot under water. Some administrative body there should have been able to say, ok activate Plan A now, the one for the million people.

Why do we always wait till after disasters to realise these things? Same thing with the tsunami warning systems in the orient, though those are actually in place for the US coast.

There are plans for London, they even know where they will bury the dead, and guess what - it's Blackheath, where the plague dead lie.

It's easy to be wise after the event, but there are actually people paid to put contingency plans into place - I read somewhere that that function was privatised in N.O. and the private company proclaimed that everything was going to be hunky-dory.

My point is that New Orleans should uniquely have had a very good, well-resource plan ready to activate for when the levees burst. It shouldn't have needed all this scrambling around afterwards trying to know what to do.

By the way other countries are offering whatever assistance is needed. The Brits have offered to do whatever they can. Even some poor countries have offered, which is either touching or insulting, probably the former.

Everybody is now an expert on the management of floods and disasters, of course.

You have to be angry at all politicians though, I think. They're always on holiday, and they're always lazy to respond - remember Putin and the Kurtz submarine? He stayed on holiday.

I think if I were a leader and a disastrous event was about to unfold, I'd be on the scene and tell people in no uncertain terms what to do. I'd have a team of experts and if they said it'll be under 20 feet of water I'd say I want everybody - everybody - out of there now, whatever it takes.

And yes I think a million tents can be erected on a prairie somewhere if need be. We see the refugees in Darfur and Rwanda, not to mention Palestine, in their hundreds of thousands - and by comparison to the scenes from N.O. those camps now look moderately well organised, don't you think?

I would like to keep a sense of proportion and realise the US internal refugees may go without food or water for a few days, due to poor administrative systems, but at least we know there is food and water there somewhere for them. In Africa all too often we see people for whom there is nothing.

The US helped Indonesia generously I think with ships and aid and all that, and I'm sure if Indonesia had the wherewithal and if the US would even accept then they would help if they could.

There is a lot of anti-Americanism around, but remember you have invasion forces in countries overseas. There are very few countries in the world which are actually in the process of invading other countries. So it's a knee-jerk reaction for people outside the US to react with spite to America.

For myself, I don't like what your government and therefore your forces are doing overseas, and I don't like Bush's whole attitude, one little bit. I'm completely out of sympathy with lots of aspects of your culture, even my daughter-in-law's glowing support for "our president". Oh, we hate him here, I had to tell her - which she found incomprehensible.

But then I hate the Brits as well. I like actual individuals, but all national pretensions give me the willies. "The French" - a pain. "The Brits" - a bore. "The Yanks" - boors. "The Irish" - phoneys. Etc. To hell with all nationalism. Individuals are ok. I like people. I like English people, American people, Irish people, French people etc - but I hate our national pretensions.

Well disasters are always happening. It's over there today, it'll be here another day. Best wishes to all, and I hope systems of preparedness are put in place for all cities, for anything that could happen them.

Next time when there's a disaster maybe it will really be a case of Activate Plan A. That would be good, I think. And somebody will say but there was a plan - well it wasn't good enough- improve it.

Thanks for the report. Glad you're safe and sound, as I already said elsewhere.

Os

9:47 AM  
Blogger Ossian said...

Correction. I meant my step-daughter (one of) not my daughter-in-law. She's an air-hostess living in Pittsburgh who was lucky not to be on-board one of the 9/11 planes and she lost some colleagues. She's the one who's reassured by "her president" taking care of things. I'll stop maundering on now.

Cheers

10:44 AM  
Blogger Ossian said...

I know I've been a bit simplistic in my comments. I'm shallower than the waters there, alas. Sorry.

5:34 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Michele, thanks for taking the time to write your experiences for us to share.

I've noticed a tendency in the media this past week to use quotes out of context, to report rumours, to be judgmental. The media shouldn't be doing these things, but maybe the disaster is just so complicated they can't get an objective grasp of it all.

It was interesting to hear today from an air force commander whose company was in position and prepared ahead of time. There were other components of rescue forces similarly prepared and waiting. I gather that, as each group covers its ass, the main thing preventing co-ordination and prompt responses was a failure of communication... not only from cell phone and land line phone breakdowns, but also from/between various government bodies.

The National Guard should only be activated by a state governor's decision. The Federal Emergency Measures Agency (FEMA)is under the control of the Secretary of Homeland Security or the President (not sure which). Regular forces (air, sea, land) are under the command of the Secretary of Defense and President. On and on it goes - politicians and bureaucrats tripping over each other, not wanting to tread on each other's toes, cognizant only of protocol.

Preventing communication breakdown demanded that a back-up plan be in place: no land lines? no cell phones? go to radio (walkie talkie) equipment. If that isn't sufficient, go to satellite-enabled equipment. Surely to God in this age of technology there is something that can be done in this regard.

In all fairness, the city was destroyed when the levees failed. Local politicans have been lobbying for the levees to be reinforced for a long time. Lack of federal funding is the nail in that coffin. The federal gov't must bear responsibility for putting the city at risk.

As for evacuating people to the super dome: it was supposed to be a short term refuge until the hurricane passed - a matter of hours (12 - 24?). The ensuing horror happened because the levees failed to prevent flooding.

There were many institutions that did not evacuate in anticipation of the hurricane - hospitals, prisons, nursing homes. And it's becoming apparent that many individuals chose to stay in their homes for their own reasons. The Mayor couldn't force those residents to leave. So, the number of people bearing responsibility for risky decisions is large.

We look to national gov't as a saviour in times of crisis even as we look to it with derision when we see how it spends our tax money. We loathe it as much as we look to it (ideally) for leadership. But the litmus test is always, always, always its behaviour in times of crisis. It's obvious the current federal gov't has failed its citizens in this tragedy by condoning the risk factor associated with not maintaining the levee system.

Thank God individuals all over the world, but especially in the U.S., have stepped up to comfort and console, and to open their homes and their hearts to evacuees. From the Houston Astro Dome today there was footage of a volunteer reading a story to a group of small children, and another organising a crafts table. Schools will be taking evacuees into their classrooms next week. A little sunlight is making its way through the clouds - and it's this grass roots, community- and individual- based response that will show the dingbats in high political office what leadership is really all about.

I haven't had a job for the past 2 months and my savings are running out. I have an interview next Friday, and if this successfully translates to employment, I'm going to donate money to Habitat for Humanity. This organization helps people build houses. It's too bad they can't use cypress wood when they re-build N.O. and the other stricken towns, as I hear those old homes built 100 yrs ago with it have held up very well.

Good luck with your house guests, and I hope your health improves. Get some rest. Love and hugs.

10:17 PM  
Blogger mi'chele said...

Os, you are not at all shallow nor are you simplistic. You made some very good points and gave an excellent counterbalance. It is this sort of dialogue that should go on among peoples of all nations.

I cannot argue with what you have said. You are right. There are many sides that are right. I don't know why there wasn't a better plan. I would suggest the money for planning was spent on other things - Louisiana politics being as corrupt as they are. (A statement I am not suppose to make, but a fact, nonetheless.)

I recall the effort that was made to get teachers to stage a phone campaign to get the legislature to approve gambling, with the promise that the revenue generated from the casinoes would go to education. What they didn't tell us was the money we were getting from other sources prior to the legalization of gambling would be diverted to other projects. We would not get more, we would just draw from a different fund.

I am also angry at the politicians - alll politicians. I have no faith in any of them. The old cliche is, if they are honest when they get elected, they are soon corrupted.

Indonesia has offered assistance. From the little they have, they have pledged 200 paramedics and 10,000 blankets. Makes me cry every time I say that. The simplicity and sincerity of the gift is heart wrenching.

Please keep presenting the other sides, Os, lest I lose perspective.

10:23 PM  
Blogger mi'chele said...

Cheryl, you were posting as I posted. Thank you, as always, for your contributions. You take so much time to learn so much that you can share.

I will be writing about the houseguests. It is going to be a joy to have them!

10:27 PM  
Blogger mez said...

Thanks for the report Michele. The 'blogosphere' has been an excellent source of news and views over this period, not least for the ability to pick up narratives which intelligently dissent from the narrative handed down from the executive.

I doubt an equivalent disaster would have been handled much, if any, better here (one early response by those charged with our protection after 7/7 was the execution in public of a innocent Brazilian national in an utterly incompetent police national security and intelligence operation. Yet no-one is under arrest, charged, or suspended.)

And I don't doubt that the really significant looters here would prove eventually to be, as there, the corporations and individuals who have mis-spent funds earmarked for civil defence or who will win contracts for reconstruction. It's an ill wind etc...Those folks will end up with millions of $$'s and not some shitty widescreen TV (which is more of a curse in reality than a prize) on which to view diminishing and demeaning garbage and government and lobby propaganda. It seems a confirmation of poverty in all its aspects that the TV, the propaganda unit of the status quo, should be regarded as desirable booty.

If anything positive comes out of this disaster or any other it could only be if the people who work for the People take the job as a serious honour and not a junket-ridden sinecure and if those jobs aren't, as here, often filled with functionaries who have risen courtesy of the Peter Principle to their present positions. More likely though, I guess, that when the initial anger subsides people will slump back into their anaesthatised comas and those that don't will knock themselves out trying to see a way to make local and national govt responsive to their aspirations and not the other way round.

On the human level it's a great relief that you are ok physically. I hope that the predictions of how long it will take to get people back to their own homes and lives are way out, and that the clean-up can be done much quicker, though those pictures from Biloxi and elsewhere which look like shots of Hiroshima show that there's no going back for many people.

I know the coming period will be tough for you all out there. Here's hoping it may lead to better things and not just a return to the same old same old.

In any case, I hope in your personal sphere the good times will roll again, and soon.

cheers
mez

7:58 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home